THE ROLE OF LANDSCAPE ART IN CULTURAL AND NATIONAL IDENTITY: CHINESE AND EUROPEAN COMPARISONS (part 2)

Part 2 of the article about the art of landscape painting in relation to cultural and national identity; In part 1, the authors examined Chinese ‘shan shui’ painting, the culture and, more broadly, the philosophy of ‘shan shui’ painting. The rest of the article will present some of the countries representing Europe: the Netherlands, England, Norway and Finland, along with some discussion by the authors. The article is a serious and evocative study, the art is placed in relation to the historical context but also not far from the philosophy of life, which will surely bring readers interesting insights.

Cultural and National Identity in Europe

While dominant features of Chinese culture were evolving during the first millennium, Europe was experiencing a period of political fragmentation. Across much of the continent it was not until the tenth century AD that the political map started to settle into bounded spaces. However, the cultural map was increasingly shaded with forms of pan-European Christianity. In China, a common means of written communication was supplemented by a religio-philosophical culture based on Confucianism and Taoism in which the representation of the natural world was increasingly pre-eminent. In Christianizing Europe, with no unifying language across the continent except for the continued use of Latin by élites, the dominant religious culture emphasized the actions of individuals in the form of Christ and his followers. Art was dominated by religious painting with nature as little more than a background [24]. Like Confucianism, Judaeo-Christian traditions emphasize the importance of nature—but, importantly, rather than seeing mankind as being part of nature they generally see nature as created for mankind to use.

The two pre-conditions for the creation of national identity are, firstly, external differentiation involving rivalry with alternative powers elsewhere, and secondly, cultural standardization. China experienced cultural standardization and the continuity of a culture of dynasticism, with important dependent cultural elements prevailing, even during periods of non-Han rule. But there was little recognition of external differentiation until relatively recently in the history of the country. By contrast, a process of ‘othering’ was crucial throughout Europe in the creation of feelings of identity and nationalism, involving both positive constructions of ‘who we are and what we stand for’, and negative constructions of ‘who we are not’ in distinction to other groups and communities. In a series of publications, Anthony Smith [25,26] identified these conditions as emerging in early modern Europe, from the fifteenth century onwards.

The earliest manifestations of independent cultural and then national identities in Europe occurred in those countries that became Protestant from the sixteenth century onwards—for example the Netherlands—with important implications for the subject matter of art. Here the unifying effect of Catholicism was removed to be replaced by a form of Christianity that was locally self-governed, thus enhancing the element of differentiation and potential ‘othering’—and the potential for the development of a national culture. In addition, Protestantism has parallels with Confucianism in that individuals can seek to better themselves through self-examination and through their own actions, rather than believers appealing to saints and others to intercede with God.

Most commentators see nationalism, and its associated attributes of national identity, as a product of modernism—foregrounding the development of capitalism, the shift from agrarian to industrial bases for the economy and society, and the creation of new unifying political and economic objectives for communities and territories that were previously much more loosely integrated [27,28,29,30]. In Europe, the crucial period for such developments occurred after the French Revolution. As Anne-Marie Thiesse [31] has it, the nineteenth century saw the conversion from a Europe of princes to a Europe of nations, involving not just a transformation of the map of states, cultures and identities but also a radical mutation in representations and images; and this process necessitated a considerable programme of ‘re-education’ for the populations involved. The arts, and particularly painting, played an important role in elevating cultural awareness and the creation of a sense of nationhood.

While nature had provided the dominant and most prestigious motif in art for several centuries in China, equivalent depictions remained of very little significance in Europe until well into the seventeenth century, and much later in many parts of the continent. Of all the potential things that artists might paint, it might seem surprising that landscape, generally the least regarded of subjects, came, by the late nineteenth century, to play a defining role in the development of modern cultural and national consciousness and identity throughout Europe. There is a vast literature on European landscape art. However, the aim here is to illustrate the main relationships between the depiction of landscapes and identity issues, doing so through a brief consideration of trends in four European countries—Holland, England, Norway and Finland. The artistic trends in the four chosen countries were very different stylistically, yet in each case the depiction of landscape became strongly associated with cultural and national distinctiveness. The art of other areas that contributed more to the development of European consciousness than to national identity, such as Italy or France, has been omitted from the discussion.

Holland

Holland saw the first flowering in Europe of a landscape art that could be said to become part of ‘national’ culture and identity [32]. The painting of landscape was introduced to Holland by artists fleeing from Flanders to escape the Catholic Spanish regime there once Holland had declared itself a Protestant republic. Flemish artists such as Pieter Bruegel and Rubens had already depicted everyday and rural scenes alongside their other works, and Rubens painted rural scenes specifically for his own amusement and interest—much as the scholarly shan shui painters in China did.

The Dutch established a flourishing trading society in the later sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, in which the emphasis on religious art was quickly abandoned. The nature of the fledgling republic also reduced the power of patronage in supporting portraiture and other traditional styles, although these were certainly still produced, for example by Rembrandt. Supplementing them came an interest in the depiction of scenes of Dutch life, at both domestic and wider scales, including landscapes which, in a pre-industrial period (and therefore contrasting with the example of England 200 years later), included both rural scenes and urban perspectives. The patrons were no longer found in church institutions but in the newly confident and wealthy bourgeoisie, and paintings were supplemented by etchings of similar scenes for books, which therefore took such art widely into the homes of the growing Dutch middle class [33]. Artists increasingly produced works to cater for a speculative market, rather than on commission, and thus market demands began to define artistic production, leading to the determination of a first example of democratically determined national ‘taste’ for a particular style of art. The ‘national’ element is clear in several works where the Prinsenvlag—the flag flown by Dutch ships during the revolt against the Spanish Hapsburgs—appears as an iconic element in the composition. Hendrik Avercamp included the flag in several of his works (see Figure 4).

Figure 4. Winter Scene. By Hendrik Avercamp. c 1615 AD.

What is also particularly interesting, in any comparison with Chinese art, is that although certain painters of the period depicted actual named places, the vibrant practice grew of artists (such as Salomon van Ruysdael) constructing their own images taking elements of the Dutch landscape—waterways, cattle, mills, cottages—and assembling these in their studios into paintings that can be seen as ‘symbolist’ interpretations of the Dutch world. Here there is an echo of the practices of shan shui painting. Simon Schama [34] talks about these practices as not creating imaginary landscapes, but as “a deliberate inventory of topographic givens.” Artistic works incorporating generic elements of the everyday environment can have a much broader appeal in representing a particular society and its relationship with its environment than can paintings which are specifically ‘about’ a place that few potential viewers may have direct experience of—something that is equally true of traditional shan shui in China. Dutch landscape art in the Golden Age was not, therefore, truly realistic in style but represented Holland to its inhabitants in ways they could recognize and which became part of their understanding of their own country, of its physical characteristics, and of the lives that were lived within it. Dutch landscape painting had become national art, arguably the first such development in the world providing an independent cultural identity for a newly developing nation state. Paintings by Cuyp, Vermeer and Bruegel still appear in lists of the favourite paintings of today’s Dutch citizens.

England

There is a voluminous literature on landscape, landscape art and the creation of a distinctive cultural identity in England [32,35,36]. English landscape art is often identified as having been initiated in a period of reaction to the agricultural and industrial revolutions and the large-scale urbanization of the population. Two particular painters are normally identified as crucial in this process—J M W Turner and John Constable. In reality, their contributions are rather different. In surveys of the nation’s favourite paintings, Constable’s The Hay Wain always occupies one of the top slots. Turner’s Fighting Temeraire is placed close to it. However, whilst The Hay Wain is incontrovertibly a work of landscape art, Turner’s picture is a historical painting, relating to the breaking up of an old naval vessel. Both paintings, however, are now imbued with a sense of nostalgia, as are many other of Constable’s works (see Figure 5)—and it can be argued that this is a distinctive contribution of landscape art to English cultural sensibilities, and to the feeling of national identity which, today, as for nearly two centuries, has harked back to an idealized past, often seen as rural in nature. Turner may ultimately have had a greater effect on successive artists and he was more original in his art, but it was Constable, with his imitative paintings (in Platonic terms), who had the greater influence on the rise of landscape as part of English cultural and national identity.

Figure 5. Dedham Lock and Mill. By John Constable. c 1820 AD.

In English, use of the term ‘landscape’ does not refer purely to natural phenomena, and in the dominant traditions of English landscape painting the presence of agriculture is clear, whilst in the majority of Constable’s most-recognized works there are a number of human figures carrying out everyday tasks; it could be argued that Constable’s art combines landscape and genre subject matter. But it is a ‘tamed’ countryside that is depicted [35]. The process of artistic creation can be witnessed in the numerous oil sketches Constable made en plein air before working his paintings up in his studio [37]. He was therefore producing landscape paintings of recognizable locations. Like the Dutch artists of the Golden Age, he was contributing to what came to be seen as ‘national art’, but unlike them, his art was consistently tied to place, rather than producing a generic view of landscape features that repeat across a wide tract of country. ‘Constable Country’ is therefore an English rural region to be visited and celebrated through the paraphernalia of guidebooks, suggested walks, and so on. Constable never travelled outside England, so his art was not influenced by the quality of the light elsewhere in Europe. He thus produced work that was contrasted with an ‘other’ elsewhere, and reflected the distinctiveness of England, without himself ever experiencing that ‘other’. In this, he fulfilled one of the criteria for the creation of national identity—distinctiveness from an alternative. Constable’s contribution to English cultural identity, and to the emphasis that English national identity places on rurality and the significance of certain specific regions, is today very clear [38].

It can be suggested that large-scale social unrest in many parts of rural England during the years 1830–32, known as the ‘Captain Swing riots’, led an increasingly urbanized middle-class population to welcome an image of a safer ‘natural’ world of simple rural activities. Constable’s ‘six-footers’, of which The Hay Wain and Dedham Lock and Mill (Figure 5) are examples, were initially more well-received in France than in England, but as the century progressed, and as England became more urban and industrial, Constable’s landscapes rose in esteem amongst his fellow countrymen until he gained his status as the ‘national painter’ [39]. Constable, as with most of his contemporaries [40], omitted the conditions of the rural poor. Yet his art is not neutral. Although seen as ‘realist’, it is in fact rooted in a view of rural life as wholesome and ‘authentic’. Such a view is echoed in many aspects of literature and poetry produced at a similar period, and in other later movements. Landscape art contributed with other cultural productions to the establishment of an English national identity, clearly articulating an idealized view of the countryside and rural societies as lying at the heart of what the nation meant—and such a national identity was strongly marked by nostalgia [41]. English landscape art has continued in the tradition Constable set, of depicting specific and recognizable places—from the Newlyn School of the late nineteenth century (in Cornwall), through Eric Ravilious in the 1930s (in Sussex), to recent work by David Hockney in the Yorkshire Wolds.

Our argument is that landscape art became a defining element of English cultural identity from the period of greatest industrialization onwards. Economic change brought massive migration from rural to urban areas and the celebration of rural landscape through art enabled society to reach back to what was increasingly seen as a lost utopia. Nostalgia for a rural past, and the emphasis put on the countryside, remain a dominant element in English culture in various forms. But English landscape art remained naturalistic and realist in depicting actual places and scenes. Few artists followed the Chinese or the Dutch practice from the Golden Age of creating imaginary landscape art from an assemblage of prevailing elements, or from an ideological belief in what was beautiful, meaningful or important.

Norway and Finland

Large parts of Europe, despite the rise of nationalism since the Treaty of Westphalia of 1648, and the reorganization of many political units and borders after the defeat of Napoleon in 1815, were, during the nineteenth century, still under the rule of what many in those regions saw as ‘alien’ powers. During the nineteenth century, many of these ‘subservient’ nations saw enhanced interest in the arts as part of the assertion of—and struggle for—separate national identity and independence. Norway and Finland were two such countries, neither achieving full sovereignty until the start of the twentieth century. In both cases, literature, music and landscape art played a major role in the expression of national ambitions.

Having been linked with Denmark from 1533 onwards, with only a four-year break, Norway was ceded to Sweden in 1814 as one of the collateral outcomes of the Napoleonic Wars. A brief conflict ensued, after which a dual kingdom with Sweden was established, but it was not until 1905 that Norway became fully independent. From the 1860s onwards, the country developed a series of democratic institutions and became more self-confident in its economic growth after decades as one of the poorest countries in Europe, but it remained tied to Sweden with a joint king (from the Swedish royal family) with powers to veto legislation passed by the Norwegian Storting or parliament. The union with Sweden was finally dissolved in 1905 after the failure of the relationship between the king and the Storting.

Finland had been a part of the Swedish kingdom until the war of 1808-09 when it passed to the victorious Russian Empire, only gaining full independence at the time of the Russian Revolution in 1917. Although Russian rule tended to be relatively benevolent and provided for elements of local autonomy, national claims for the creation of a Finnish state grew more vocal, particularly when, towards the end of the nineteenth century, stronger policies of Russification emerged from St Petersburg.

In both Norway and Finland, an important early element in rising cultural awareness was a renewed interest in legends, sagas and folk tales from the past—and the printing of volumes of these, illustrated with pictures of rural settings. As in Holland, works of art depicting local (‘national’) scenes first made their way into many houses as book illustrations, often by distinguished artists.

A significant motif in the development of a nationalist trend in landscape art lay in the physical geography of the two countries. Much of Norway is massively mountainous and the viewing of such a landscape reflected the growth of Romanticism and the changing attitudes to mountain scenes in European cultural sensibilities from the eighteenth century onwards. The fjord landscape of Western Norway involved scenery that distinguished the country from both its former ‘partner’, Denmark, and from its post-Napoleonic co-state, Sweden. Differentiation from ‘others’ and the distinctiveness of Norway could be shown in depictions of such scenery. Fjord lands were seen as ‘authentic’, true, and with traditional cultures of daily life—unlike the cities where urban culture had adapted to influences from elsewhere [42]. In this way, Norwegian art with nationalist pretensions also reflected in some ways the ethos of English landscape art in looking to the countryside for something more ‘traditional’ and genuine. However, in the Norwegian case this was a search for a purer culture, whereas in the English it was inflected more by nostalgia for a past that was being transformed by modernization.

Finland offers very different scenery. While Norwegian landscape artists looked up to the mountains, generally taking low viewpoints, Finnish artists often adopted a high viewpoint over what came to be recognized as the dominant elements of Finnish landscape painting—an emphasis on the juxtaposition of water and forest, with the absence of mountains. In Finland, lakes and forests take on the symbolic importance of mountains and water (shan and shui) in Chinese art—converted into Finnish culture as senlin shui (forest-water in Mandarin).

Scandinavian painters, whether part of nationalist movements or not, also contributed to the establishment of an iconography associated with the Nordic light of the sub-Arctic regions [43]. They also singled out landscape features that were unique to, or dominant in, the region, and elevated them to symbolic status. One example is the birch tree. Many Scandinavian artists had visited, or studied in, Italy where the birch is largely absent: they therefore saw the tree as indicative of their Northern identity. In emphasizing its presence in their art they demonstrated the difference between their land and a famed ‘other’.

The role of art in the development of Norwegian self-awareness and nationalism has been recently claimed to be a pivotal influence [44]. From the middle of the nineteenth century onwards the general cultural movement Det Unge Norge (New Norway) sought to build national identity, with the movement’s artists arguing that landscape art was the best medium for capturing the Norwegian character [45]. Similar movements developed at the same time in Finland with, in both countries, landscape art taking the lead alongside music and literature. The work of two artists at the turn of the twentieth century—the years immediately leading up to independence in both Norway and Finland—can be seen as exemplars.

Harald Sohlberg (1869–1935) epitomizes the relationship between landscape painting and Norwegian national identity. His Winter Night in the Mountains (Figure 6) of 1914 was, in 1965, featured on a postage stamp and in 1995 was proclaimed Norway’s ‘national painting’ after a public vote; it was similarly regarded from the time of its first exhibition, ten years after independence, and it has hung in a prominent position in the National Gallery in Oslo since 1918. Yet, this is not a typical realist landscape depiction. It was painted after an extended sojourn by Sohlberg in the Rondane Mountains south of Trondheim, but it is not an imitative ‘view’. It is instead a symbolist representation in which the general elements of a nocturnal Norwegian landscape are reassembled on canvas through the agency of the artist’s creativity. Øivind Bjerke [46] has described Sohlberg’s methods using language that reflects the intellectual approach of the shan shui masters: “His visualization in this work is the outcome not just of emotions stirred by a certain view, but also of ruminations, reflections, choices and thoughts about what mountains meant to him personally and the ways he perceived them through the paintings, literature and music of others”.

Figure 6. Winter Night in the Mountains. By Harald Sohlberg. 1914 AD.

Alexander Brett [45] has commented: “Winter Night in the Mountains is perhaps not so much a national painting as a national view; a quintessential Norwegian view that has simply been brought to life”.

A Finnish contemporary equivalent to Sohlberg was Akseli Gallen-Kallela (1865–1931)—now particularly identified as leader of the National Romantic movement in Finnish art. The National Gallery in London holds one of Gallen-Kallela’s most important works—which is also one of the favourites among visitors: Lake Keitele, painted in 1905 (Figure 7). This work, produced at a time when Finnish nationalistic claims were growing, is in a distinctly naturalistic style. The four versions of this landscape image, with other of the artist’s works, came to stand for Finland’s claims for cultural nationalism and the demand for independence from Russia. The original critical reception of Gallen-Kallela’s work suggests that his landscapes epitomized what Finns struggling for independence felt was unique and valued about the landscapes of their country. As William Cook [47] put it in an article associated with a recent London exhibition: “In these paintings, Gallen-Kallela created an image of Finland which all Finns could recognize as their own—and in doing so, he helped his countrymen shake off the Russian yoke and found a nation.”

Figure 7. Lake Keitele. By Akseli Gallen-Kallela. 1905 AD.

These Scandinavian examples reinforce the point that the English case of the development of a national landscape art and its role in wider national identity should not be seen as a universal model. Instead, the role of landscape art in the paths to nationalism have been different in different countries. Where English landscape art in the foundation period of the early nineteenth century provided an antithesis to urbanization and industrialization and the attendant changes in society, Norwegian and Finnish landscape painters sought to identify the distinctiveness of their country in ways that were part of a nationalist argument. They placed value on local landscapes and their component elements. Landscape painting was part of the promulgation of the idea of a distinctive culture, separate from that of a colonial (or in Norway’s case, partner) state next door. It played a role in the twin processes leading to cultural self-identification—external differentiation (‘our land is different from theirs’) and internal cultural standardization, through the provision of a common set of images allied to the establishment of a national literary tradition through the retelling of folk tales and of epics.

Finally, however, there is irony in the fact that although Finnish culture employed landscape art (alongside literature and music) to affirm its distinctiveness from that of controlling Russia, Finland itself could be seen as a colonial power in its relations with the Sámi people (or Lapps) of the Far North. Finnish landscape art was selective in what it celebrated. Until recent decades, Finnish cultural traditions were not ready to accept the wild moorlands of Lapland as an integral part of the cultural landscape, nor the ‘uncivilized’ and ‘barbaric’ Sámi as true Finnish citizens. It was only from the middle of the twentieth century that landscape depictions of the Sámi lands became established as part of Finnish artistic culture [48]. The establishment of a Finnish ‘national landscape’ through art was as selective as in several other countries—for example, Britain where the dominant artistic ‘national landscape’ became identified predominantly with Southern England.

Discussion

This paper has considered the evolution of cultural identity at the opposite ends of the Eurasian landmass, with reference to the role of depictions of the ‘natural’ scene in establishing and maintaining notions of distinctiveness among social and political groups. The depiction of landscapes and of nature has been important as a marker of identity in both world regions. However, more detailed consideration shows a number of fundamental differences, as well as areas of convergence.

Chinese cultural history has, for more than 2000 years, revered nature through ways of thinking derived from Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism placing mankind firmly within the natural world. Reflections on nature have been dominant influences in the production of a variety of Chinese artefacts, from porcelain to furniture, music to painting. But alongside the reverence for nature, Chinese culture has also stressed the importance of self-reflection and the need for individuals to develop self-awareness as part of the ‘way’ to a good life. These two elements together—reverence for nature, and personal self-seeking—combine to create the techniques of Chinese landscape art (shan shui) that have been foundational elements of culture since at least the Song dynasty a thousand years ago. The artist seeks to portray the essence of the subject matter as he understands it—an Aristotelian approach. Such art is primarily a mode of self-expression for the artist, rather than a means of educating or influencing a wider public.

European art, by contrast, was primarily concerned with religious figure painting right until the middle of the last millennium. Such art was always educational in some form, commissioned by religious or public authorities and intended to influence those who gazed on it. Only with the Reformation and the, to some extent independent, secularization of European societies did other subjects become seen as appropriate for artistic endeavor—and with increasing value placed upon them.

When European artists turned to the depiction of nature and of landscapes, they generally sought to imitate what they had seen. Their art was rooted in specific settings and often influenced by plein air work and the creation of field sketches prior to recourse to the studio. The landscapes that formed the subject matter were then local to the artist (as for Constable) or easily visited within the limited confines of European nation states. The varied distinctiveness of the physical geography of Europe was brought out as a signature element in the art thus produced. Such paintings contributed strongly to a geographical and topographical element in cultural consciousness, and the spreading of knowledge of what particular places and landscapes within the countries concerned actually looked like. And the fact that representational paintings were produced of particular places has elevated these locations themselves, as well as the art produced there, to be part of national or international heritage. For example, the citations on the UNESCO World Heritage List as landscapes defined as ‘associative cultural’ reference the artistic associations for sites such as the English Lake District. The political units within which art and culture were being developed in Europe were very much smaller than in China, which was a united empire for most of the last 2000 years. In Europe, with its linguistic and political fragmentation as well, often, as religious and economic divergences, art could be used as a basis for the delineation of national distinctiveness. Landscapes and landscape art have become as much part of cultural and national identities as have, for instance, religious sites [49].

In Holland, where some artists composed their works using elements drawn from the world outside their studios, the outcomes were sometimes scenes that could have existed, but which were figments of the artists’ imaginations. These highly coloured works, in oil paint, contrast with the abstracted and simplified ink and wash drawings of shan shui art. But if shan shui work represented a certain idea of China and its cultural values, European landscape art, produced in a much more fragmented political context of rival states (or nations aspiring to statehood), carried much stronger messages about particular cultures, economies and political ambitions.

While European artists were providing images that, in most cases, illustrated places that could be visited, Chinese art produced something very much more generalized and abstract. Over vast areas of the Chinese lowlands, shan shui depictions of mountains and cascades bore no relation to the everyday experience of nature for millions of Imperial subjects. In the Yellow Mountains (Huangshan) of Anhui province, or in Zhangjiajie Forest Park in Hunan province, shan shui art is more closely related to observable ‘reality’, but this was much less the case elsewhere. However, this did not reduce the importance of shan shui for the millions living in the flat lands of Central Eastern China. Instead, it elevated such depictions into symbols of a China that millions of people could have no direct or indirect experience of. Shan shui became the basis of a national artistic culture, but also of an idea of ‘China’ and as an embodiment of the philosophy and the values underpinning the Empire as a whole. It is also notable that certain of the citations of Chinese sites in the UNESCO World Heritage List also refer, as in Europe, to their associated artistic significance—as in the Lushan National Park and the West Lake of Hangzhou, both of which display elements that could inspire a painter of shan shui. European landscape art has always been educational as well as carrying cultural identifications. As we have seen, Dutch landscape art flourished in a period of commercial success and the creation of a bourgeois class who bought art that reflected the country that they now felt was ‘theirs’ after a period of Spanish domination. English landscape art became associated with a nostalgic view of a lost rural past, a view that then played a major contributory role, alongside similar trends in other creative activities, in the definition of national identity. Norwegian and Finnish landscape painting was a vehicle for supporting independence claims through the demonstration of the distinctiveness of national landscapes. Whilst in China, until the early years of the twentieth century, there was effectively one style of ‘national art’ seen in a specific tradition of shan shui painting, in Europe different traditions of landscape painting evolved in different countries in response to different social, economic and political realities. But in each case landscape art came to play an important role.

Shan shui differs in many profound ways from Western landscape art. Just as mankind is part of the natural world, so the shan shui artist is also part of his own subject matter and can be interpreted, indeed, as being his own subject matter. The artist’s comprehension of himself and his relationship to the world constitutes the essence of shan shui art. Chinese philosophical views on nature and on personal self-reflection have a long history and are mirrored by the continuity of a style of art that is an integral part of this thinking. Such art forms an essential part of the culture and reflects Aristotle’s views on creativity and the task of the artist to abstract from the superficial and reflect the totality of the human condition. The artist is within the culture and is part of it. He has a unique relationship to it through his own personality and interpretations. The culture is bigger than the artist and he reflects it, but without changing it. Shan shui painting continues with little change in style for a thousand years from the late Song period onwards.

European landscape art has been created in a very different philosophical context involving greater upheavals in economic, social and political processes. Artists have worked within temporally and spatially significant contexts, but always with a view to the consumption of their art by others. Such contexts have meant that artists have created wider messages within their work and thus had a greater effect on ‘public’ cultures than the more personal and intimate works of shan shui artists working within an enveloping Chinese culture. European artists have been part of evolutionary movements in art, reflecting political, economic and social realities, and have created images that are specific to periods and places at a variety of scales. Chinese landscape depictions play a precise role in Chinese cultural identity, as also do European landscape depictions, given the messages that they carry, in the establishing of national identities.

In China, with its long Imperial history and the continuous absorption of external elements into the Imperial whole, cultural identity was formed many centuries before there was a political need to establish a national identity beyond that of the Imperial family, the court and the highest officials. Such a need did not really develop until the growth of threats to the strength of the Empire during the nineteenth century. In Europe, by contrast, the modern cultural identity of individual states was not evident until well into the second millennium AD and in many cases developed almost simultaneously with national identity. Landscape art lay at the heart of Chinese culture for several hundred years; in Europe it took on political significance as both cultural and national signifier, and often did so in a period of little more than a century. Yet at both sides of the Eurasian land mass, landscape art, in its different forms, remains closely associated with cultural identities. Paintings of natural scenes, in the continuing variety of styles and media, remain popular with the general public—often now as national cultural markers for international tourists. Political regimes may change, but the depiction of landscape through art supports, reinforces and perpetuates cultural and national identities in both China and Europe. However, how this situation has come about has differed significantly between the two world regions.

Author Contributions

All sections of the article were jointly written by the two authors, with P.W. undertaking the final editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

R.W.’s research was supported by Shanghai Jiaotong University Research Fund, which also paid the publishing charge for the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

24. Clark, K. Landscape into Art, 2nd ed.; John Murray: London, UK, 1976. [Google Scholar]
25. Smith, A.D. National Identity; Penguin: London, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
26. Smith, A.D. The Cultural Foundation of Nations: Hierarchy, Covenant and Republic; Bloomsbury Academic: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
27. Gellner, E. Nations and Nationalism; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
28. Hobsbawm, E. Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
29. Sassoon, D. The Anxious Triumph: A Global History of Capitalism 1860–1914; Allen Lane: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
30. Smith, A.D. Nationalism and Modernism; Routledge: London, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
31. Thiesse, A.-M. Des fictions créatrices: Les identities nationales. Romantisme2000, 110, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
32. Smith, A.D. The Nation Made Real: Art and National Identity in Western Europe, 1600–1850; University Press: Oxford, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
33. Onuf, A. Envisioning Netherlandish unity: Claes Visscher’s 1612 copies of the Small LandscapeJ. Hist. Netherlandish Art 2011, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
34. Schama, S. Kunstzaken; Contract: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997. [Google Scholar]
35. Berberich, C. This green and pleasant land: Cultural consciousness of Englishness. In Landscape and Englishness; Burden, R., Kohl, S., Eds.; Rodopi: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
36. Readman, P. Storied Ground: Landscape and the Shaping of English National Identity; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
37. Rosenthal, M. Turner and Constable: Sketching from Nature; Tate: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
38. Rosenthal, M. Constable and Englishness.  Art J.2006, 7, 40–45. [Google Scholar]
39. Helsinger, E. Constable: The making of a national painter.  Enq.1989, 15, 253–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
40. Barrell, J. The Dark Side of the Landscape: The Rural Poor in English Painting, 1730–1840; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1980. [Google Scholar]
41. Bishop, P. An Archetypal Constable: National Identity and the Geography of Nostalgia; Athlone Press: London, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
42. Austad, I.; Hauge, L. The ‘Fjordscape’ of Inner Sogn, Western Norway. In Nordic Landscapes: Region and Belonging on the Northern Edge of Europe; Jones, M., Ed.; University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
43. Leguy, A.-E. Les peintres Nordiques et la ‘Lumière du Nord’ au tournant du XX^e. Études Ger.2016, 282, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
44. Prideaux, S. The Landscape Painters Who Invented Norway. Apollo, 4 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
45. Brett, A. Nationalism in the Landscapes of Harald Sohlberg. Fika Online. 29 April 2019. Available online: https://fika-online.com/2019/04/29/nationalism-in-the-landscapes-of-harald-sohlberg/(accessed on 15 September 2019).
46. Bjerke, Ø.S. Winter Night in the Mountains. In Harald Sohlberg: Infinite Landscapes; Hindsbo, K., Ed.; Hirmer: München, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
47. Cook, W. The Painting That Inspired Finnish Independence.  Life, 17 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
48. Hautala-Hirvioja, T. Frontier landscape—Lapland in the tradition of Finnish landscape painting. Acta Boreal.2011, 2, 183–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
49. Dastgerdi, A.S.; de Luca, G. Specifying the significance of historic sites in heritage planning.  Sci. Cult. Herit.2019, 18, 29–39. [Google Scholar]

Written by Xiaojing Wen and Paul White

Source: MDPI